Evolution? Macro or Micro ??
In the December issue of Natural History, Stephen Jay Gould of Harvard (one
of the foremost evolutionists in the world) destroyed the case for classic
Darwinian evolution. After citing two cases of microevolution he states;
“Most cases of rapid microevolution represent the transient and momentary
blips and fillips that ‘flesh out’ the rich history of lineage in stasis.”
One of his conclusions is that we find stasis (no change) in most living
systems and not transition to new creatures. This is a very good
scientific observation. It confirms the Bible when it tells us that
animals were created in “kinds” that are distinct and separate. Actually
there is a great deal of variety within kinds of animals. Dogs for example
range from the Teacup Yorkie to the Great Dane, with all different
variations; long hair, short hair, long legs, short legs... You can’t,
however take that dog and mate it with your cat and get a dat. Our science
tells us that is impossible. Even the chromosome count is not the same.
If evolution were true we would expect to find such a blur of creatures
that we should have trouble classifying them. But we generally don’t have
trouble telling a cat from a dog. The variation that Gould is referring to
are changes in the already existing DNA not new DNA appearing. The very
complex instructions to build living creatures contained in DNA allows for
great variation in progeny but does not create new organs or functions. If
mutations were desirable why don’t we irradiate every pregnant woman to
improve the children. We know mutations are bad and we try to avoid them.
When evolutionists propose molecules to man they MUST produce new DNA from
random mixtures of chemicals. This is IMPOSSIBLE. Both chemistry and
biology tell us it is impossible. Random processes do NOT generate
information. Information requires intelligence. In my seminars I often
challenge the audience to test this by going to their computer and randomly
tapping on their keyboard until they write a program. That, of course, is
impossible. In fact when we get a mutation in a computer, we call it a
bug, we try to get rid of it, not see what new and better functions it will
give us. The more we know about how our bodies work the more in wonder and
awe we will become. The intelligence required to design us has to be
almost infinite. In fact it is !!! Questions?
Email me.
|